Service

Excel Financial Models

Excel financial models still run a large share of American finance, and most of them were built under time pressure by someone who has since left. Finalert builds new models properly and repairs inherited ones. A model is finished when a stranger can open it, follow the logic from input to output, and find no formula that contradicts the cell beside it.

An empty glass meeting room
8 things this engagement covers, and a 9-step process.

Who it is for

Who this is for.

  • 8 things this engagement covers, listed below with what each one includes.
  • A 9-step process, the same one on every engagement.
  • 6 questions answered on this page.

Overview

The typical problem is not that the model is wrong today. It is that nobody can prove it is right. Assumptions are hard-coded inside formulas, one column in a calculation row was edited during a late night, the balance sheet was forced to balance with a plug, and the only person who understood the circularity has moved on. The output still looks authoritative, which is the dangerous part.

We build three-statement models that balance, forecast and budget models, transaction and lender models, and unit economics workbooks. Structure comes first: inputs in one place, calculations in another, outputs in a third. Checks sit on the front tab so a broken model says so instead of returning a confident wrong number.

Our work is structural. We separate what is typed from what is calculated, make every formula in a row identical across its columns, replace plugs with real logic, and put error checks where they are visible. Then we document each assumption with its source and its owner. What you get back is a workbook your team can change with confidence and hand to a lender without apologising for it.

Finalert builds and repairs Excel financial models for U.S. companies. Two kinds of work come through the door. The first is a new build: a three-statement model, an operating budget, a lender or transaction model, a unit economics workbook. The second is a rescue, where you have inherited something the business depends on, nobody quite trusts it, and the person who built it is gone. The second is more common and often the more valuable of the two.

We work in Excel and, where your team lives there, in Google Sheets. The structural discipline is the same in either: inputs, calculations and outputs kept apart, one formula repeated consistently across a row, no hard-coded number sitting inside a calculation, and checks that fail visibly. Formatting conventions mark what may be typed and what must never be touched, so the next person to open the file can see the difference immediately.

How a model is built to hold up

A three-statement model has to balance for a reason, not because a plug was inserted to make it close. Profit and loss, balance sheet and cash flow are linked properly, with working capital, debt schedules, fixed assets and tax each driven from their own schedule. When the balance sheet does not tie, the check on the front tab goes red and points at the schedule responsible, which is how you find the error in ten minutes instead of a day.

Every assumption is written down with its value, its source and the person who owns it. Growth rates, headcount plans, payment terms and margin assumptions sit on an input tab where they can be changed and traced, never buried inside a formula halfway across the sheet. Sanity checks run alongside: cash never negative without the facility showing it, depreciation never exceeding the asset base, margins staying inside a range you consider credible.

Inherited workbooks and version control

A rescue starts with an audit, not a rewrite. We trace the formulas, list the inconsistencies, find the hard-coded values and the broken links, and give you a written picture of what the model actually does, including anywhere the current output is wrong. You then decide whether to repair or rebuild. Version control is treated as part of the model: named versions with dates, a change log recording what moved and why, one master file with a clear owner, and inputs isolated so a scenario can be run without editing the logic.

We also agree how the model gets its actuals each period, so the forecast is refreshed on a routine rather than rebuilt from scratch. The limits are worth stating plainly. We build the model and we run it if you want us to. The assumptions and the decisions taken from the output stay with your finance leadership, whose name goes on the numbers. We do not sign tax filings, issue audit or attest opinions, give legal advice, or act as your accountant of record, and a model review is not an audit of your financial statements.

What you get

What the engagement covers.

8 items

  • Three-statement integrated models

    Profit and loss, balance sheet and cash flow linked properly, with working capital, debt, fixed assets and tax each driven from their own schedule rather than a plug.

  • Structured inputs, calculations, outputs

    A clean separation of what is typed, what is calculated and what is presented, with formatting conventions that show at a glance which cells may be changed.

  • Consistent formulas across rows

    One formula repeated across every column in a row, with no hand edits hiding in period seven. Inconsistencies are the most common source of silent model error.

  • Error and sanity checks

    Balance checks, cash flow ties and range tests gathered on a front tab, so a broken model announces itself instead of returning a number that looks reasonable.

  • Documented assumption register

    Every assumption listed with its value, its source and its owner, kept on an input tab where it can be traced and changed without touching any calculation.

  • Inherited model audit and repair

    A written review of a workbook you depend on: inconsistencies, hard-coded values, broken links and errors in the current output, with a repair or rebuild recommendation.

  • Actuals refresh routine

    A defined way to load each period's actuals from your ledger into the model, so the forecast is updated on a routine instead of rebuilt by hand every quarter.

  • Version control and change log

    Named, dated versions with one master file and a recorded owner, and a change log of what moved and why, so nobody argues about which copy is current.

How it runs

How the work runs.

Whether we are building new or repairing an inherited workbook, the model is tested against a period you already know the answer to before anyone relies on the forecast. This is the sequence.

  1. 01

    Scope the model and its readers

    We establish what decisions the model supports, who will open it, what level of detail is genuinely needed, and what the output has to look like when it is done.

  2. 02

    Audit what exists

    Any current workbook is traced formula by formula and reviewed for inconsistencies, hard-coding and errors, with the findings written up before we agree repair or rebuild.

  3. 03

    Agree structure and conventions

    Tab layout, the split between inputs, calculations and outputs, formatting conventions and naming are agreed with your team so the file matches how you work.

  4. 04

    Collect and document assumptions

    Each assumption is gathered with its source and owner and recorded on the input tab. Anything nobody can source is raised with your finance leadership rather than guessed.

  5. 05

    Build the historical base

    Closed-period actuals are loaded from your ledger and reconciled to the statements you have already issued, giving a known answer for the model to reproduce.

  6. 06

    Build schedules and link statements

    Working capital, debt, fixed assets and tax schedules are built, then linked into the three statements so the balance sheet ties without any balancing figure.

  7. 07

    Add checks and stress the inputs

    Error and sanity checks are added to the front tab, then inputs are pushed to extremes to confirm the model breaks visibly rather than returning a plausible wrong answer.

  8. 08

    Review with your team

    We walk your controller and your analysts through the logic tab by tab, take their corrections, and confirm the model reproduces the periods you have already closed before anyone relies on the forecast.

  9. 09

    Handover, version control and support

    The master file, the change log, the documentation and the refresh routine are handed over, with an agreed period of support as your team starts using it.

Our approach

How we approach it.

Modelling standards exist because a spreadsheet will happily give a wrong answer with no complaint at all. These are the rules we apply whether the job is a new build or someone else's workbook.

An office reception area

These are the rules we apply whether the job is a new build or someone else's workbook.

Nothing typed inside a formula

Every constant lives on an input tab where it can be found, sourced and changed. A rate buried inside a calculation is an error waiting for a quiet period.

One formula per row

A calculation row uses the same formula in every column. Any deliberate exception is flagged and explained on the sheet rather than left for someone to discover.

Checks visible on the front tab

Balance and sanity checks sit where the reader lands, not buried at the bottom of a hidden schedule. A failing check should be impossible to miss.

No plugs to force a balance

If the balance sheet does not tie, we find the cause. A balancing figure inserted to close a gap hides the real error and invites it to grow.

Readable by a stranger

Consistent layout, plain labels, a contents tab and notes where logic is unusual. The test is whether a new analyst can follow it without a phone call.

Assumptions belong to you

We build the mechanics and challenge what looks unlikely. The growth rates, the pricing and the plan are your finance leadership's decisions and are recorded as theirs.

Proof

What clients say, and what the work has done.

  • 110+ U.S. businesses served
  • 100% client satisfaction
  • 111 services we run

Finalert is an outstanding accounting, financial advisory and analytics company that delivers a wide range of services and solutions with the highest level of professionalism. Their expert team, with whom I have personally worked, possesses exceptional skills that enable customers to meet their financial and accounting needs seamlessly. Their dedication to excellence and customer satisfaction sets them apart, making them a trusted partner in the industry.

Wajdi Al MowafakDirector, Financial Business · Nonprofit
Recent engagement CWS Global Nonprofit & Humanitarian 50% faster month-end close Real-time grant and donor visibility Audit-ready compliance Read the case study

Questions

Common questions.

The questions finance leaders ask most often before commissioning a new model or handing us an inherited workbook to repair, covering rebuild decisions, tooling, ownership of assumptions and keeping the file current.

Should we repair our model or rebuild it?

We audit it first and give you the answer in writing. Workbooks with sound structure and a few broken areas are usually worth repairing. Ones with hard-coded values scattered through the calculations, plugs holding the balance sheet together and no consistent row logic are faster and safer to rebuild. You decide with the comparison in front of you.

Why not move us off Excel entirely?

Because Excel is often the right tool. It is flexible, your team already knows it, and a well built workbook is easy to audit. The problems people blame on Excel are almost always structural discipline problems. Where a model has genuinely outgrown a spreadsheet we will say so, but we will not push a migration you do not need.

Can you work in Google Sheets instead?

Yes. If your team lives in Google Sheets we build there and apply the same standards: separated inputs, consistent row formulas, visible checks and a documented assumption register. Some heavier models perform better in Excel, and we will tell you when the size of the model makes that the practical choice.

Who owns the assumptions in the model?

Your finance leadership does. We build the mechanics, document each assumption with its source and owner, and challenge anything that looks unlikely against your own history. The growth rates, the pricing and the plan are your decisions, and the model records them as yours so the reader knows where they came from.

How do we keep the model current?

We set up a defined routine for loading each period's actuals from your ledger, so the forecast is refreshed rather than rebuilt. Combined with a change log and one master file with a named owner, that keeps the workbook alive instead of drifting into a set of competing copies.

What is not included?

A model review is not an audit of your financial statements. We do not sign tax filings, issue audit or attest opinions, give legal advice, or act as your accountant of record. We do not set your assumptions or make the decisions the model supports, and we do not provide valuation or investment advice.

About Excel Financial Models

Ready for numbers you can build on?

Talk to a Finalert consultant about your books, your reporting, or the decision you are trying to make.

110+ U.S. businesses served

What happens next

  1. A twenty-minute call An accountant on the line, not a salesperson.
  2. A scope and a price, in writing What the work covers, and what it costs.
  3. Onboarding on your schedule We start when you are ready, not before.

Monday to Friday, 8:00am to 5:00pm ET Cleveland and New York